Queerscribe ([info]queerscribe) wrote,
@ 2001-07-26 13:19:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Something To Chew On...
From contours provocations:

Sunday's "The New York Times" had an interesting article about "Capital Punishment and Homicide Rates." Someone wrote in to the "Sunday Q & A" column and asked, "Is there a noticeable difference in homicide rates between states that have the death penalty and those that do not?"
The reply was surprising. "Over the last 20 years, the homicide rate in states with the death penalty has been 50 to 100 percent higher that the rate in states without it..." The "Times" columnist was wise enough not to hazard a guess as to why.



(1 comment) - (Post a new comment)

ha
(Anonymous)
2001-10-27 01:19 pm UTC (link)
dude, this comment is late, but hey. my guess: cause not effect. places with higher crime tend to generate demands for stricter penal codes, whether or not they're effective. ergo in states with high murder levels you get stronger support for the death penalty, it gets (re)instated or doesn't get abolished when it does in states with lower murder rates, and since the death penalty is by and large ineffective as a deterrent, the murder rate doesn't drop, and you're left with the situation the article mentions.
--
adamw

(Reply to this)


(1 comment) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…